Elevated levels of CO 2 and O 3 affect plant growth and phytochemistry, which in turn can alter physiological performance of associated herbivores. Little is known, however, about how generalist insect herbivores respond behaviorally to CO 2 ‐ and O 3 ‐mediated changes in their host plants. This research examined the effects of elevated CO 2 and O 3 levels on host plant preferences and consumption of forest tent caterpillar (FTC, Malacosoma disstria Hbn.) larvae. Dual choice feeding assays were performed with foliage from birch ( Betula papyrifera Marsh.) and aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx., genotypes 216 and 259). Trees were grown at the Aspen Free Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) facility near Rhinelander, WI, USA, and had been exposed to ambient or elevated concentrations of CO 2 and/or O 3 . Levels of nutritional and secondary compounds were quantified through phytochemical analyses. The results showed that elevated O 3 levels increased FTC larval preferences for birch compared with aspen, whereas elevated CO 2 levels had the opposite effect. In assays with the two aspen genotypes, addition of both CO 2 and O 3 caused a shift in feeding preferences from genotype 259 to genotype 216. Consumption was unaffected by experimental treatments in assays comparing aspen and birch, but were increased for larvae given high O 3 foliage in the aspen genotype assays. Elevated levels of CO 2 and O 3 altered tree phytochemistry, but did not explain shifts in feeding preferences. The results demonstrate that increased levels of CO 2 and O 3 can alter insect host plant preferences both between and within tree species. Also, consequences of altered host quality (e.g., compensatory consumption) may be buffered by partial host shifts in situations when alternative plant species are available. Environmentally induced changes in host plant preferences may have the potential to alter the distribution of herbivory across plant genotypes and species, as well as competitive interactions among them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrell et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: