Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing penetration of distributed photovoltaic generation and the move toward quarter-hourly imbalance settlement, exemplified by the Italian Testo Integrato del Dispacciamento Elettrico reform, make ultra-short-term power forecasting a critical operational and economic task. Although machine-learning forecasters have improved statistical accuracy, they are commonly trained and evaluated with symmetric error indicators that do not reflect the asymmetric monetary effects of over- and under-forecasting. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a decision-oriented framework for fifteen-minute-ahead photovoltaic power nowcasting that embeds market asymmetry in both evaluation and learning. The framework introduces two methodological contributions: an Expected Monetary Impact indicator, which translates forecast deviations into monetary losses at quarter-hour settlement resolution, and a differentiable price-aware asymmetric loss function, which penalizes positive and negative forecast errors according to their market costs. The Italian reform is used as a realistic case study, while the formulation can be transferred to other markets with short settlement intervals and asymmetric imbalance prices. Long Short-Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Unit, and a Locally Recurrent Neural Network trained through the Binet formalism are evaluated as alternative forecasters against persistence under a rolling out-of-sample protocol using real measurements from a photovoltaic facility in Milan, with 2023–2024 used for training and 2025 for testing. The learning-based models outperform persistence: Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit reduce the normalized monetary impact by 18.22% and 19.39%, respectively, while the locally recurrent model achieves a 54.72% reduction. These results show that market-aligned forecasting objectives provide greater operational value than conventional symmetric accuracy indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhingra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: