Key result
Cangrelor resulted in similar rates of favorable 90-day functional outcomes compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (40.0% vs 31.5%; adjusted OR 2.22) for managing refractory intracranial occlusions.
Why the study?
Cangrelor may be a valuable option for refractory occlusions after thrombectomy failure, but its safety and efficacy compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors had not been compared.
Does cangrelor improve favorable outcomes in patients with refractory intracranial occlusions compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors?
Observational (n=69)
Yes
Does cangrelor improve favorable outcomes in patients with refractory intracranial occlusions compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors?
Odds Ratio: 2.22 (95% CI 0.42–11.75)
Absolute Event Rate: 40% vs 31.5%
p-value: p=.348
Cangrelor appears to be a safe alternative to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for managing refractory intracranial occlusions after mechanical thrombectomy failure, with a trend toward improved reperfusion.
Comparable outcomes in this cohort; leaves open cangrelor's role versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in refractory occlusions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rescue endovascular and pharmacologic approaches are increasingly being adopted after recanalization failure of acute large-vessel occlusion strokes with mechanical thrombectomy, with encouraging results. The safety and efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in ischemic stroke have been investigated, though cangrelor, a recent intravenous P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with a rapid onset/offset of action and a short half-life, may be a valuable option. We compared the safety and efficacy of cangrelor with those of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for refractory occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the ongoing prospective, multicenter, observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between May 2012 and February 2020. Refractory intracranial occlusions of the anterior and posterior circulation were included and defined as recanalization failure of large-vessel occlusion stroke, perioperative target artery reocclusion, or high risk of early reocclusion related to an arterial wall lesion. The primary end point was a favorable outcome, defined as a 90-day mRS of 0–2. Secondary end points were reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and procedural complications. RESULTS: Among 69 patients, 15 were treated with cangrelor, and 54, with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The favorable outcome (adjusted OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 0.42–11.75; P = .348) and mortality (adjusted OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.06–3.16; P = .411) rates were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rates of any intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.08–2.09; P = .280), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.7% versus 0.0%, P = .058), or procedural complications (6.7% versus 20.4%, P = .215). Reperfusion rates were higher in the cangrelor group, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (93.3% versus 75.0% for modified TICI 2b–3; adjusted OR =10.88; 95% CI, 0.96–123.84; P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor seems to be as safe as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for managing refractory intracranial occlusion and leads to satisfactory brain reperfusion. Cangrelor is a promising agent in this setting, and additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marnat et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Refractory proximal intracranial occlusions (n=69). Cangrelor vs. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was evaluated on Favorable outcome (90-day mRS of 0-2) (adjusted OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.42-11.75, p=.348). Cangrelor resulted in similar rates of favorable 90-day functional outcomes compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (40.0% vs 31.5%; adjusted OR 2.22) for managing refractory intracranial occlusions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: