This article traces some of the conversations between a European circus clown named Pipo and myself in order to draw out the characteristics of intertextuality that I argue are key features of the ethnographic endeavour. Central to our conversations was a concern with our mutual productions of identity as clown artist and ethnographer. I explore how ambiguous, parodic, and subversive such productions can be. Along the way Pipo taught me a few good jokes and something of how to tell them and I try them out on modernist anthropology in an effort to make this “body” of knowledge/power parodic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenneth Little (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: