This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence, and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated. AREAS COVERED: Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deben et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: