Key result
The virtual reality Trier Social Stress Test (V-TSST) elicited comparable stress reactivity to the traditional TSST (cortisol ES 0.61 vs 0.79; heart rate ES 0.98 vs 0.85; differences not significant).
Why the study?
Research comparing stress reactivity induced by virtual reality TSST (V-TSST) versus the traditional TSST across neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and self-report variables had not been systematically and quantitatively reviewed.
Does the V-TSST induce comparable stress reactivity to the traditional TSST?
Meta-Analysis
Does the V-TSST induce comparable stress reactivity to the traditional TSST?
The virtual reality Trier Social Stress Test is as effective as the traditional version at eliciting physiological and self-reported stress reactivity.
V-TSST matches traditional TSST for stress induction; confirms equivalence and supports wider use in research and clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: The traditional Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is a widely used standardized stress induction protocol and has recently been adapted in a variety of virtual reality environments (V-TSST). Research has demonstrated the ability of the V-TSST to induce a stress reactivity response measured via cortisol, heart rate, and self-report. However, research comparing stress reactivity induced via the V-TSST to the traditional TSST across neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and self-report variables has not yet been systematically and quantitatively reviewed. METHODS: In this meta-analytic review, the existing studies that used V-TSST were gathered, and each was age and sex matched with samples using the traditional TSST. These studies were then meta-analytically synthesized to determine if there was a moderating effect of TSST type (traditional TSST or V-TSST) on multiple measures of stress reactivity (i.e., cortisol, heart rate, and self-report). RESULTS: Examining the pre-post stress induction, the V-TSST studies demonstrated comparable effect sizes (ESs) for stress reactivity (cortisol ES = 0.61, heart rate ES = 0.98, self-reported stress ES = 0.94) to traditional TSST study ESs (cortisol ES = 0.79, heart rate ES = 0.85, self-reported stress ES = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The TSST type differences between ESs were not statistically significant, indicating that the V-TSST is as effective as the traditional TSST at eliciting a physiological and self-reported stress reactivity response. Implications and limitations of this meta-analysis are discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helminen et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Stress reactivity. Virtual reality Trier Social Stress Test (V-TSST) vs. Traditional Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was evaluated on Stress reactivity (cortisol, heart rate, and self-reported stress) (p=not statistically significant). The virtual reality Trier Social Stress Test (V-TSST) elicited comparable stress reactivity to the traditional TSST (cortisol ES 0.61 vs 0.79; heart rate ES 0.98 vs 0.85; differences not significant).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: