Key result
BNP and NT-proBNP demonstrated good diagnostic performance for detecting paediatric pulmonary hypertension, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 29.50 and an AUROC of 0.91.
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension is life-threatening with non-specific symptoms in children, making accurate detection vital for early treatment and mortality reduction.
Does measurement of BNP or NT-proBNP accurately detect pulmonary hypertension in the pediatric population?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,127)
Does measurement of BNP or NT-proBNP accurately detect pulmonary hypertension in the pediatric population?
Odds Ratio: 29.5
Both BNP and NT-proBNP demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for detecting pulmonary hypertension in pediatric patients, which may aid in early detection and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening disease, especially in paediatric population. Symptoms of paediatric PH are non-specific. Accurate detection of paediatric PH is helpful for early treatment and mortality reduction. Therefore, we assessed the overall performance of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for diagnosing PH in paediatric population. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were screened since their respective inceptions until August 2023. A bivariate random model and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model were used together to evaluate and summarize the overall performance of BNP and NT-proBNP for diagnosing paediatric PH. RESULTS: Eighteen studies using BNP/NT-proBNP were assessed, comprising 1127 samples. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUROC) of BNP/NT-proBNP were separately as 0.81, 0.87, 6.33, 0.21, 29.50 and 0.91, suggesting a good diagnostic performance of BNP/NT-proBNP for detecting PH in paediatric population. For BNP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUROC were 0.83, 0.89, 7.76, 0.19, 40.90 and 0.93, indicating the diagnostic accuracy of BNP for paediatric PH patients was good. For NT-proBNP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUROC were 0.81, 0.86, 5.59, 0.22, 24.96 and 0.90, showing that NT-proBNP could provide a good value for detecting paediatric PH. CONCLUSIONS: Both BNP and NT-proBNP are good markers for differentiating paediatric PH patients from non-PH individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Paediatric pulmonary hypertension (n=1,127). BNP and NT-proBNP testing vs. Non-PH individuals was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting paediatric pulmonary hypertension (DOR 29.50). BNP and NT-proBNP demonstrated good diagnostic performance for detecting paediatric pulmonary hypertension, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 29.50 and an AUROC of 0.91.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: