This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Very high turbulent dissipation rates (above ε = 10−4 W kg−1) were observed in the nonlinear internal lee waves that form each tide over a sill in Knight Inlet, British Columbia. This turbulence was due to both shear instabilities and the jumplike adjustment of the wave to background flow conditions. Away from the sill, turbulent dissipation was significantly lower (ε = 10−7 to ε = 10−8 W kg−1). Energy removed from the barotropic tide was estimated using a pair of tide gauges; a peak of 20 MW occurred during spring tide. Approximately two-thirds of the barotropic energy loss radiated away as internal waves, while the remaining one-third was lost to processes near the sill. Observed dissipation in the water column does not account for the near-sill losses, but energy lost to vortex shedding and near-bottom turbulence, though not measured, could be large enough to close the energy budget.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klymak et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: