Accurate dosing and careful monitoring of low molecular weight heparins, including recording patient weight, are essential to prevent underdosing and overdosing.
Inconsistent weight recording for LMWH risks dosing inaccuracies; leaves open whether system-level interventions improve safety.
Low molecular weight heparins such as enoxaparin are used to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism and to treat acute coronary syndromes. These medicines are given parenterally by intravenous or subcutaneous injection. They offer advantages over regular unfractionated heparin: they are seen as effective,1 with a low risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia; patients are likely to spend less time in hospital because of the long duration of action and, where appropriate, subcutaneous administration. In the UK, low molecular weight heparins are considered the treatment of choice and are increasingly being used including outside hospital. Indicative figures for prescribing in England in 2008/092 suggest that over a third (1.1 million) of all enoxaparin doses of 60 ml or greater were prescribed in the community. However, different clinical indications require different doses and frequency. For instance doses for treatment depend on the patient’s weight, unlike the standard doses given for prophylactic use. Underdosing can increase the risk of a further thromboembolic event, while overdosing can increase the risk of bleeding. Accurate dosing and careful monitoring is needed, particularly for those with renal impairment, because low molecular weight heparins are excreted through the kidneys. Concerns about inconsistent use of prophlyaxis for venous thromboembolism has led to high-profile guidelines by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.3 But clinicians may be less aware of the potential for harm from errors in treatment doses. A recent audit of 16 hospitals in Wales showed that weight was not recorded in almost half of patients receiving low …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamont et al. (2010) studied this question.