Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel climate downscaling methodology that attempts to correct climate simulation biases is proposed. By combining an advanced statistical bias correction method with a dynamical downscaling it constitutes a hybrid technique that yields nearly unbiased, high‐resolution, physically consistent, three‐dimensional fields that can be used for climate impact studies. The method is based on a prior statistical distribution correction of large‐scale global climate model (GCM) 3‐dimensional output fields to be taken as boundary forcing of a dynamical regional climate model (RCM). GCM fields are corrected using meteorological reanalyses. We evaluate this methodology over a decadal experiment. The improvement in terms of spatial and temporal variability is discussed against observations for a past period. The biases of the downscaled fields are much lower using this hybrid technique, up to a factor 4 for the mean temperature bias compared to the dynamical downscaling alone without prior bias correction. Precipitation biases are subsequently improved hence offering optimistic perspectives for climate impact studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colette et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: