Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The chromophore of visual pigments is 11-cis-retinal and, thus, in its absence, opsin is not photosensitive and no visual function exists. However, in the RPE65 knockout (Rpe65-/-) mouse, where synthesis of 11-cis-retinal does not occur, a minimal visual response from rod photoreceptors is obtained. We have examined if an alternative pathway exists for cis-retinoid generation in the absence of RPE65. Cyclic-light-reared, 2-month-old Rpe65-/- mice were placed in complete darkness. No exogenous retinoids were administered. After 4 weeks, enhanced a- and b-wave amplitudes were obtained, increasing >10-fold for the a-wave and >3-fold for the b-wave as compared with cyclic-light-reared Rpe65-/- mice. Visual-pigment levels increased to approximately 10 pmol per retina, compared with no measurable pigment for cyclic-light-reared Rpe65-/- mice. The lambdamax of the isolated pigment was 487 nm, characteristic for isorhodopsin. Retinoid extractions confirmed the presence of 9-cis-retinal and the absence of 11-cis-retinal. Once the Rpe65-/- mice were returned to cyclic light, within 48 h the electroretinogram function returned to levels found in Rpe65-/- mice maintained in cyclic light. This dark-mediated pathway is also operational in older animals, because 13-month-old Rpe65-/- mice kept in prolonged darkness (12 weeks) had increased isorhodopsin levels and electroretinogram a- and b-wave amplitudes. These studies demonstrate that a pathway exists in the eye for the generation of 9-cis-retinal that is independent of RPE65 and light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: