Why the study?
The relationship between myocardial perfusion imaging and aortic calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease remains unclear.
Does the presence of aortic calcification predict major cardiac events in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease?
Does the presence of aortic calcification predict major cardiac events in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease?
Aortic calcification on chest radiograph, especially when combined with myocardial perfusion imaging abnormalities, is a useful independent predictor of major cardiac events in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification in elderly CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background: The relationship between myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and aortic calcification (AoC) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remains unclear.Methods: The Japanese Assessment of Cardiac Events and Survival Study by quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography (J-ACCESS 3) is a multicenter, prospective cohort study investigating the ability of MPI to predict cardiac events in 529 CKD patients. In J-ACCESS 3, the sum of myocardial perfusion defect score at stress (SSS) was a useful predictor of cardiac major events in CKD patients. However, aortic calcification was not examined. We examined the prognosis of patients with CKD according to the presence or absence of AoC using data from the J-ACCESS 3 cohort.Results: There were 60 major cardiac events (three cardiac deaths, six sudden deaths, five non-fatal myocardial infarctions, 46 hospitalization cases for heart failure). In the univariate analysis, patients with AoC had a higher left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, smaller LV volume, and lower SSS by MPI. Kaplan–Meier curves showed a significantly higher incidence of major cardiac events in the AoC group (P=0.0041). Patients were categorized into the following four groups: Group A (non-AoC and SSS<4; normal score of 0–3); Group B (AoC and SSS<4); Group C (non-AoC and SSS≥4); Group D (AoC and SSS≥4). Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the major cardiac events rates were A<B<C<D (P=0.002). The difference was most pronounced between the AoC and no-AoC groups with SSS<4.Conclusions: The combination of SSS using MPI and AoC is a useful predictor of cardiac major events in CKD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muramatsu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: