Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evolutionary sequences at M/Msun = 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 were calculated with a version of the Eggleton stellar evolution code for an initial composition X = 0.70, Z = 0.02. From these sequences 14 models spanning the lower part of the Cepheid instability strip were selected for pulsation calculations. All the linear adiabatic m-degenerate eigenvalues with l ≤ 3 for pulsation constants Q[= P(<ρ>/<ρsun>)1/2] in the range 0d.0096 ≤ Q ≤ 0d.067 were obtained with a modified version of Dziembowski's second pulsation code, and our code uses a variant of the Cowling approximation for the nonradial modes. Four hundred and eighty-nine Q-values for 35 modes of types F-7H and g₂-p₇ are presented. interpolation formulae are provided which predict the model masses, radii, and luminosities from the model periods and temperatures, with worst case errors of 4.4, 2A, and 1.2% in M, L, and R, respectively, when using any of the radial mode or some of the nonradial f- and p-mode results. These formulae were applied to a selection of eight `5 Scuti and three Al Velorum type variables to yield masses and luminosities in the ranges 1.68 ≤ M/Msun ≤ 2.56 and 15.4 ≤ L/Lsun ≤ 78.0, respectively. If our pulsation constants are relevant, then the primary uncertainties in these results follow from the uncertainties in the effective temperatures for these stars, which are here discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. S. Fitch (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: