This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A ‘functional’ approach to constitutional interpretation is well-accepted in many other jurisdictions, including the United States, and offers a promising middle path between the extremes of pure formalism and pragmatism. It is, however, under-developed as an approach to constitutional interpretation, rather than doctrine, in Australia. The article offers an exploration of what it would mean to adopt a more explicitly functionalist approach to the interpretation of the Constitution, drawing on constitutional cases decided by the High Court in 2014.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosalind Dixon (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: