Why the study?
There are no easy, non-invasive biomarkers available to guide the diagnosis and treatment of major depressive disorder.
Does breath gas analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) differentiate patients with major depressive disorder from healthy controls?
Does breath gas analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) differentiate patients with major depressive disorder from healthy controls?
Breath gas analysis of volatile organic compounds shows potential as a non-invasive biomarker to differentiate patients with major depressive disorder from healthy controls.
Breath VOC analysis may support MDD biomarker development; leaves open diagnostic validation in prospective cohorts.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a widespread common disorder. Up to now, there are no easy and frequent to use non-invasive biomarkers that could guide the diagnosis and treatment of MDD. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are different mass concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath between patients with MDD and healthy controls. For this purpose, patients with MDD according to DSM-V and healthy subjects were investigated. VOCs contained in the breath were collected immediately after awakening, after 30 min, and after 60 min in a respective breath sample and measured using PRT-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry). Concentrations of masses m/z 88, 89, and 90 were significantly decreased in patients with MDD compared with healthy controls. Moreover, changes during the time in mass concentrations of m/z 93 and 69 significantly differed between groups. Differentiation between groups was possible with an AUCs of 0.80-0.94 in ROC analyses. In this first study, VOCs differed between patients and controls, and therefore, might be a promising tool for future studies. Altered masses are conceivable with energy metabolism in a variety of biochemical processes and involvement of the brain-gut-lung-microbiome axis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lueno et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: