Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have a presumed role in excitatory synaptic transmission and nociceptive pathways. Although previous studies have found that inhaled anesthetics inhibit NMDA receptor-mediated currents at clinically relevant concentrations, the use of different experimental protocols, receptor subtypes, and/or tissue sources confounds quantitative comparisons of the NMDA receptor inhibitory potencies of inhaled anesthetics. In the present study, we sought to fill this void by defining, using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique, the extent to which diverse clinical and aromatic inhaled anesthetics inhibit the NR1/NR2B subtype of the human NMDA receptor expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. At 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC), anesthetic compounds reversibly inhibited NMDA receptor currents by 12 ± 6% to 74 ± 6%. These results demonstrate that equianesthetic concentrations of inhaled anesthetics can differ considerably in the extent to which they inhibit NMDA receptors. Such differences may be useful for defining the role that this receptor plays in producing the in vivo actions of general anesthetics. IMPLICATIONS: We found that equianesthetic concentrations (1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) of 15 structurally diverse inhaled anesthetics produced a sixfold range of inhibition of the human N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, a finding that may be useful in a determination of the contribution of NMDA receptor inhibition to the MAC of inhaled anesthetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solt et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: