Why the study?
Does a volume-selective power optimization technique improve signal-to-noise ratio in proton spectroscopy of the human calf muscle at 7 T compared to conventional power calibration?
Does a volume-selective power optimization technique improve signal-to-noise ratio in proton spectroscopy of the human calf muscle at 7 T compared to conventional power calibration?
A new localized B1 calibration technique improves signal-to-noise ratio in 7T MR spectroscopy of human calf muscle.
May improve 7T calf MRS quality; leaves open effects on diagnostic accuracy or broader adoption.
Large variations of tip angle within a slice can lead to suboptimal pulse power optimization using standard techniques, which measure the average tip angle over a slice; this effect is especially pronounced at fields of 7 T and above. A technique was introduced that performed a volume-selective power optimization in less than 10 sec and automatically calibrates the radiofrequency pulses for subsequent spectroscopy scans. Using this technique, MR spectra were acquired in the human calf of seven healthy volunteers with a partial volume Tx/Rx coil. Increases in signal-to-noise ratio based upon the unsuppressed water signal between 22+/-5% and 166+/-42%, compared to spectra obtained with the conventional power calibration technique, were measured in different regions of the calf muscle. This new technique was able to measure the inhomogeneous radiofrequency field at 7 T and its use resulted in a considerable signal-to-noise ratio increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Versluis et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: