Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals a lack of comparative trials in paediatric relapsed B-cell lymphoma, highlighting the need for randomized studies.
A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of treatments for paediatric patients, up to the age of 18 years, with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) but excluding primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). A search of Medline, Embase and the Web of Science databases was conducted to identify any prospective study or case series published from January 1 st 2016 to 31 st December 2024. On-going clinical trial databases were also searched. Articles were included if they evaluated any single agent or combination of treatments in paediatric patients with relapsed/refractory NHL who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Four studies were identified, only one of which was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). No treatment appeared in more than one trial and therefore results from each trial could not be quantitatively pooled by meta-analysis. Differences in study design, baseline characteristics and inclusion and exclusion criteria made comparison of results difficult. There is a noticeable lack of RCTs evaluating treatments for paediatric patients with relapsed/refractory mature B-cell NHL making meaningful comparisons of effectiveness across trials rather difficult. This trend continues as all except one of the 9 on-going trials in this area are single arm studies. RCTs are required to enable better evaluation of the optimal treatment regimen for this group of patients
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: