Populations and free-energy differences for the E and Z conformations of S -methyl, cyclopropyl, isopropyl, and cyclopentyl thioformate were determined by low-temperature 1 H NMR spectroscopy, and free-energy barriers of 10.63 and 11.84 kcal/mol were obtained for interconversion of E and Z conformations of S -methyl thioformate at −52.4 °C. Populations and free-energy differences were also determined at room temperature by using 13 C NMR for a series of N-substituted formamides and N -cyclopropylacetamide in 1% solutions in CD 2 Cl 2 /CH 2 Cl 2 . In both sets of compounds, electron-withdrawing groups attached to sulfur or nitrogen appear to favor the E conformations. The electronegativities of the groups are taken to increase in the order methyl < vinyl ∼ phenyl ∼ cyclopropyl < hydrogen < ethynyl. Data from the literature are discussed in these terms, including the E − Z energy differences for formic acid and its ethynyl, vinyl, and methyl esters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pawar et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: