Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Grandite garnet‐rich calcsilicate rocks from the Lower Calcsilicate Unit of the regionally metamorphosed Reynolds Range Group (central Australia) crop out along a strike‐parallel section in which a transition zone from M2 2 amphibolite to granulite facies rocks is exposed. Across this transition the grandite‐rich layers do not show systematic changes in mineral assemblages, compositions and modes, or stable isotope compositions. These layers are deformed by F2 2 folds that are associated with the peak of regional low‐pressure/high‐temperature metamorphism. Therefore, the grandite‐rich layers appear to pre‐date regional metamorphism and to have acted as closed chemical systems during prograde M2 2 metamorphism. Mineral assemblages in the grandite‐rich layers are consistent with their formation through the infiltration of oxidized, water‐rich fluids ( X co2 < 0.1–0.3; log f o2 ‐16 to ‐14). The stable isotope values of calcite (Δ 13 C=‐4.2 to ‐0.8% 0 PDB; Δ 18 O = 10.5–14.0% 0 V‐SMOW) and bulk‐silicate fractions (Δ 18 O = 6.1 to 10.8%) of the grandite‐rich layers are most consistent with the infiltrating fluid being from a magmatic source. It is most likely that fluid infiltration occurred during the pre‐M2 2 contact metamorphism (M2 1 ) that affected much of the Reynolds Range Group. The preservation of these assemblages is probably due to their high variance and little pervasive fluid‐rock interaction having occurred during M2 2 . The clinopyroxene‐ and feldspar‐rich calcsilicate rocks that host the grandite‐rich layers contain poikiloblastic grandite garnet that formed during prograde M2 2 metamorphism. Thin marbles that locally occur with the grandite‐rich layers contain a third garnet generation that is post‐ or late M2 2 . This grossular‐rich garnet occurs in coronas around calcite, plagioclase, clinopyroxene, wollastonite and scapolite. These coronas are consistent with cooling and/or compression. However, because the marble assemblages are themselves overprinted by M2 1 grandite‐rich layers the development of coronal garnet does not reflect a continuous P ‐ T ‐ t path. Rather, it more probably reflects the partial re‐equilibration of M2 1 contact metamorphic assemblages to post‐M2 2 conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buick et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: