Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the relationship between myocardial fibrosis characteristics evaluated by CMR and extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmia in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Does myocardial fibrosis evaluated by CMR predict extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Does myocardial fibrosis evaluated by CMR predict extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Myocardial fibrosis >15% characterized by LGE-CMR is significantly associated with extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
May aid arrhythmia risk stratification in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between myocardial fibrosis characteristics (percentage, localization, heterogeneity), evaluated by a non-invasive method such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), with the extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmia in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study prospectively included 173 consecutive patients who underwent electrocardiogram Holter monitoring, transthoracic echocardiography and CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, both the presence (OR=1.05, 95% CI=1.01-1.09; p=0.015), the percentage of fibrosis >15% (p=0.018), the septum size, the fibrosis in either lateral or septal walls (p=0.004), as well as fibrosis in the midwall (p=0.019) were statistically significant higher in the group with extrasystolic arrhythmia. After adjustment, the percentage of fibrosis >15%, had higher odds of extra systolic arrhythmia [OR=3.78 (95% CI=1.52-10.62, p=0.007)]. CONCLUSION: The presence, percentage, and localisation of left ventricle myocardial fibrosis characterized by LGE-CMR was associated with ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiau et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: