Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was prospectively investigated whether recognitive factors and general balance of the elderly influence recurrent falls. [Subjects] The participants were 85 elderly, cared for at day care centers, who were followed for one year. [Methods] At baseline, we evaluated fall-related self-efficacy using the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES), and measured the gap between the actual reach distance and the estimated reach distance (GAE) as a recognitive factor. We also evaluated balance using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). For the follow-up, we interviewed the participants about the number of times they had fallen in the past year. We assigned whether the participants had fallen more than twice at follow-up to a dependent variable, and with MFES, GAE and TUG at baseline as independent variables, we performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the factors which were related to recurrent falls. [Results] Fourteen participants had fallen more than twice, and it was found that GAE was related to recurrent falls. [Conclusion] GAE could be used as a factor for predicting the risk of recurrent falls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: