In vitro assays demonstrate ligand-dependent G protein selectivity across chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7, indicating natural signaling bias exists among specific downstream pathways.
Background: GPCRs can activate selective signaling pathways according to the nature of the bound ligand. Results: Coupling selectivity of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 with G protein subtypes was measured and compared with data obtained with other functional readouts. Conclusion: Some signaling bias was detected at CCR2 and CCR5. Significance: Signaling bias appears relatively subtle for natural ligands such as chemokines. The ability of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to activate selective signaling pathways according to the conformation stabilized by bound ligands (signaling bias) is a challenging concept in the GPCR field. Signaling bias has been documented for several GPCRs, including chemokine receptors. However, most of these studies examined the global signaling bias between G protein- and arrestin-dependent pathways, leaving unaddressed the potential bias between particular G protein subtypes. Here, we investigated the coupling selectivity of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 in response to various ligands with G protein subtypes by using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensors monitoring directly the activation of G proteins. We also compared data obtained with the G protein biosensors with those obtained with other functional readouts, such as β-arrestin-2 recruitment, cAMP accumulation, and calcium mobilization assays. We showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 activated the three Gα i subtypes (Gα i1 , Gα i2 , and Gα i3 ) and the two Gα o isoforms (Gα oa and Gα ob ) with potencies that generally correlate to their binding affinities. In addition, we showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR5 and CCR2 also activated Gα 12 , but not Gα 13 . For each receptor, we showed that the relative potency of various agonist chemokines was not identical in all assays, supporting the notion that signaling bias exists at chemokine receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corbisier et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: