Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work studied the intravenous injection formulation of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) loaded with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The goal was to design longer drug residence in vivo and passive targeting nanoparticles which could improve therapeutic efficacy and reduce side-effects. Based on the optimized results of uniform design experiment, 5-FU-SLNs were prepared by multiple emulsion-ultrasonication (w/o/w). The SLNs were found to be relatively uniform in size (182.1 +/- 25.8 nm) with a negative zeta potential (-27.89 +/- 5.1 mV). The average drug entrapment efficiency and loading were 74% and 10%, respectively. Compared with the 5-FU solution (t(1/2beta), 0.593h; MRT, 0.358h) after intravenous injection to rats, the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU-SLNs exhibited a longer retention time. (t(1/2beta), 4.0628h; MRT, 3.5321h). The area under curve of plasma concentration-time (AUC) of 5-FU-SLNs was 1.48 times greater than that of free drugs. The overall targeting efficiency (TE(C)) of the 5-FU-SLNs was enhanced from 13.25-20.45% in the lung and from 11.48-23.16% in kidney while the spleen distribution of 5-FU was significantly reduced as compared with that of the 5-FU solution. These results indicated that 5-FU-SLNs were promising passive targeting therapeutic agents for curing primary lung carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: