Why the study?
Does pharmacological blockade with atropine or augmentation of vagal tone with pirenzepine influence heart rate turbulence in patients without structural heart disease?
Does pharmacological blockade with atropine or augmentation of vagal tone with pirenzepine influence heart rate turbulence in patients without structural heart disease?
Vagomimetic manipulation with pirenzepine increases heart rate turbulence, while vagal blockade with atropine decreases it, suggesting normal vagal innervation is required for the phenomenon of heart rate turbulence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vagal modulation affects heart rate turbulence parameters; leaves open prognostic value and should not yet alter practice in patients without structural heart disease.
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that mortality risk in patients after myocardial infarction could be estimated by heart rate turbulence (HRT), a short-term change in heart rate after ventricular premature beat (VPB), presumably caused by baroreceptor mechanism. We sought to determine whether pharmacological blockade with atropine, or augmentation of vagal tone with pirenzepine given in small doses would influence HRT. METHODS: In 30 patients with normal echocardiogram, and without signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease, after electrophysiologic examination or radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular arrhythmias was completed, turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS) in basal state, after 1.3 mg IV pirenzepine and finally, after atropine in dose of 0.04 mg/kg of body weight were compared. RESULTS: As assessed by Friedman ANOVA test both pirenzepine and atropine caused a significant change in both TO (P < 0.01) and TS (P < 0.01). The mean basal TO of -3.6 +/- 2.9%, changed after pirenzepine to -5.99 +/- 5.6% (P < 0.01), and after atropine it changed to -3.3 +/- 18.1% (P < 0.01). The mean basal TS of 18.6 +/- 10.1 ms/R-R interval increased after pirenzepine to 26.8 +/- 19.9 ms/R-R interval (P < 0.05), and decreased after atropine to 1.2 +/- 0.8 ms/R-R interval (P < 0.01). Mean cycle length increased after pirenzepine from 706.8 +/- 106.8 to 830 +/- 151.9 ms (P < 0.01), and decreased after atropine to 454.2 +/- 58.1 ms (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A conclusion could be drawn that vagomymetic manipulation with intravenous pirenzepine increases HRT; vagal blockade with atropine decreases HRT. This finding suggests that a normal vagal innervation of heart is a prerequisite for the phenomenon of HRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vukajlović et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: