Twenty years ago, Kirschvink argued that many paleomagnetic studies were limited by the sensitivity of the magnetometer systems then in use [ Kirschvink , 1981].He showed that sedimentary rocks could preserve detrital remanent magnetizations at levels of 10 −14 to 10 −15 Am 2 , about 100—1000 times below the noise level of today's best superconducting (SQUID) rock magnetometers. If a more sensitive magnetometer could be built, it would dramatically expand the range and variety of rock types amenable to paleomagnetic analysis. Just such an instrument is now on the horizon: the low‐temperature superconductivity (LTS) SQUID Microscope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: