Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies.Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment.Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastian et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: