Requiring Professional Athletic Training Programs at the Post-Baccalaureate Level: Considerations and Concerns

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

O ver the last two decades discussions have ebbed and flowed related to whether athletic training should move to professional programs at the post-baccalaureate level. Looking back at my own beliefs I had been very much opposed to such a move; but now I simply find myself conflicted, unsure of the most appropriate direction for our profession. The reason for my conflict is that I cannot discount the positive nature that such a move might bring to the profession; nor can I discount the negative implications such a move may have. As I have listened intently to proponents of post-baccalaureate professional programs and taken time to reflect, I believe I have come to better understand the issues. This editorial serves to articulate what I believe are some positive considerations for moving toward a Post-Baccalaureate Professional Education program, heretofore referred to as an Entry-Level Masters (ELM) programs. I will also share some of, what I believe, are substantial concerns should our profession move in that direction.