Why the study?
Digital health for hypertension management has potential to improve care quality but requires long-term patient engagement to track health data.
What are patient and specialist provider preferences on data tracking for digital health technology in hypertension management?
What are patient and specialist provider preferences on data tracking for digital health technology in hypertension management?
Patients and hypertension specialists share similar perspectives on most aspects of data monitoring but differ in their preference for tracking medication adverse effects and symptoms, highlighting the need to incorporate both views when designing digital tools.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Differing patient-specialist preferences should guide digital hypertension tool co-design; leaves open effects on adherence and BP control.
Aim: Digital health for hypertension management holds potential for improving the quality of care but requires long-term patient engagement to track health data. We explored patient and hypertension specialist perceptions of clinical utility for data tracking including standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), home blood pressure (BP) measurement, and other health metrics. Methods: Participants reviewed general health status, patient satisfaction, and hypertension-specific PROMs. Semi-structured focus groups (n = 15) with nine patients with hypertension and six hypertension specialists were audio-recorded and thematically analyzed. Results: Key themes identified from patients included: (1) comfort and appreciation of home BP monitoring but only during important periods of hypertension care; (2) preference for tracking new symptoms and medication side effects; (3) patients perceived tracking other health measures including general PROMs, diet and exercise as less relevant to their care; and (4) visually represented BP trends evaluating associations with changes in other health parameters were perceived as useful. Key themes identified by hypertension specialists included: (1) concerns about patient digital literacy; (2) utilizing visual representations of long-term BP data trends for patient empowerment; and (3) unclear relevance of tracking medication adverse effects, PROMs, and other non-BP health metrics. Conclusion: Patients and hypertension specialists had similar perspectives for most aspects of data monitoring but differed in preference for a few aspects that were germane to patients, including monitoring medication adverse effects and symptoms. Including views on data tracking from both patients and providers are essential for designing digital tools to optimize hypertension management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: