This article advances a theological-philosophical account of despair as a constitutive category of theological anthropology by placing Paul’s dramatisation of the divided will (Rom 7:14–25) in critical dialogue with Kierkegaard’s analysis of self-loss in The Sickness Unto Death. Methodologically, it combines close exegesis of Romans 7 within the argumentative arc of Romans 5–8 with a reconstruction of Kierkegaard’s typology of despair (unconsciousness, weakness, defiance) and a controlled comparison. I argue that both corpora diagnose an existential incapacity before God – an ontological and relational rupture in which recognition of the good fails to result in action – whose resolution is heteronomous: participation “in Christ” (Paul) and the self “resting transparently in the power that established it” (Kierkegaard). Mapping convergences (division, incapacity, grace) and principled divergences (law/sin vs. despair/self; Spirit-christology vs. existential faith), the study proposes a “comparative grammar of grace” that resists moralism and quietism alike. The result is a taxonomy of agency, identity, and redemption, clarifying how grace reconstitutes fractured selves theologically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milan Kostrešević (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: