Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 2, 2022Journal of the Association for Research in OtolaryngologyOpen Access

Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WKWiebke KonerdingMedizinische Hochschule HannoverPBPeter BaumhoffMedizinische Hochschule HannoverAKAndrej KralMedizinische Hochschule Hannover

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Konerding et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a82322ed84e418e14ffaf6ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series2022 · 16 citations
  2. 2Lateral Wall Electrodes Increase the Rate of Postactivation Nonauditory Percepts2020 · 8 citations
  3. 3Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array2021 · 15 citations
  4. 4Investigating Facial Nerve Stimulation After Cochlear Implantation in Adult and Pediatric Recipients2020 · 26 citations