Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: Acceptance of a short distal bowel margin results in a higher rate of anterior resection but may compromise oncological safety. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a 5-mm distal margin. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was carried out of 412 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated with anterior resection with a negative circumferential resection margin. Radiotherapy was given to 63% of patients with an advanced tumour. The median follow up was 75 months. RESULTS: Fewer patients in the group with a distal margin of ≤ 5 mm had a tumour with an advanced pT stage compared to patients in the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm (P = 0.033). Two patients were converted to abdominoperineal resection because of a positive 'doughnut', leaving 410 patients, in whom 5.4% (95% CI, 0-11.3%) of the group with a distal margin of ≤ 5 mm had local recurrence at 5 years compared with 4.2% (95% CI, 2.1-6.3%) of the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm (P = 0.726). The corresponding figures for the 5-year overall survival were 82.4% (95% CI, 72.6-92.2%) vs 76.3% (95% CI, 71.8-80.8%) (P = 0.581). All four anastomotic recurrences occurred in the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm. CONCLUSION: A distal margin of ≤ 5 mm did not compromise oncological safety in patients undergoing preoperative radiation for an advanced rectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rutkowski et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: