Why the study?
It is unknown whether reducing FGF23 or phosphate alters cardiovascular risk, or if sevelamer-induced reductions in pulse wave velocity are mediated by declines in phosphate or FGF23.
Does sevelamer-carbonate improve pulse wave velocity in patients with normophosphataemic chronic kidney disease Stage 3?
Does sevelamer-carbonate improve pulse wave velocity in patients with normophosphataemic chronic kidney disease Stage 3?
In patients with normophosphataemic CKD Stage 3, short-term sevelamer treatment does not significantly improve pulse wave velocity or reduce FGF23 overall, though it may benefit those with limited vascular calcification.
Sevelamer should not yet change practice for PWV in normophosphataemic CKD stage 3; leaves open possible subgroup benefit with limited calcification.
BACKGROUND: High concentrations of both phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a surrogate marker for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It is not known whether a reduction of FGF23 or phosphate alters cardiovascular risk. Sevelamer has shown to have the ability to reduce both phosphate and FGF23 concentrations. Furthermore, reduction of PWV is reported with sevelamer use as well, but it is unclear if this is mediated by decline of phosphate or FGF23. We investigated if sevelamer induced a decline in PWV and if this was associated with a reduction in FGF23. METHODS: ) 2.4 g twice daily, with their usual diet for 8 weeks in a single-arm study. PWV was measured and blood samples were obtained before, during and after washout of treatment with sevelamer. Vascular calcification was quantified using the Kauppila Index (KI). The primary outcome was the change of PWV from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment and the secondary endpoint was the difference of FGF23 following treatment with sevelamer. One of the linear mixed models was used to analyse the association between treatment and outcome. Mediation analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. The study was registered in the Dutch trial register (http://www.trialregister.nl: NTR2383). RESULTS: A total of 18 patients completed 8 weeks of treatment with sevelamer and were analysed. Overall, treatment with sevelamer did not induce a significant reduction of PWV (β = -0.36, P = 0.12). However, in patients with less vascular calcification (lower KI score), there was a statistically significant reduction of PWV, adjusted for mean arterial pressure, after treatment (β = 0.63, P = 0.02). Addition of FGF23 to the model did not alter this association. Mediation analysis yielded similar results. FGF23 did not decrease during treatment with sevelamer. CONCLUSION: In this short-term pilot study in normophosphataemic CKD patients, treatment with sevelamer did not improve PWV. In subgroup analysis, however, PWV improved in patients with no or limited abdominal aorta calcifications. This was not associated with a decline of FGF23.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krijger et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: