Why the study?
The ratio of oxidized lipoprotein(a) to native lipoprotein(a) may index endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its correlation with Endo-PAT-measured endothelial function needed investigation.
Does the ratio of oxidized to native lipoprotein(a) correlate with endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does the ratio of oxidized to native lipoprotein(a) correlate with endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
A higher ratio of oxidized to native lipoprotein(a) is independently associated with worse endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating association of oxLp(a)/Lp(a) with endothelial dysfunction in T2DM; prospective studies needed before clinical consideration.
The ratio of oxidized lipoprotein(a) to native lipoprotein(a) (oxLp(a)/Lp(a)) may be a reasonable index for assessing endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study investigated whether the oxLp(a)/Lp(a) level is correlated with the endothelial function using the Endo-PATTM, a newly developed device, in patients with T2DM. A total of 63 patients with T2DM (mean age: 59 years old) were enrolled in the study. The patients’ serum Lp(a) and oxLp(a) levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The reactive hyperemia index (RHI) level was measured using an Endo-PATTM 2000. A correlation analysis between the measured variables was conducted. Among the patients, the mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.8%. The median level of oxLp(a)/Lp(a) was 0.28 (interquartile range: 0.07–0.54), and the mean RHI was 1.8 (standard deviation: 0.4). In a multiple linear regression analysis, the oxLp(a)/Lp(a) level was an independent, significant, and inverse variable for the RHI level (β = −0.26, p < 0.05), along with male gender. A high oxLp(a)/Lp(a) level may reflect endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by the Endo-PATTM, in patients with T2DM. Further studies are warranted to confirm the observed findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotani et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: