Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on recently published low-complexity parallel finite-impulse response (FIR) filter structures, this paper proposes a new parallel FIR Filter structure with less hardware complexity. The subfilters in the previous parallel FIR structures are replaced by a second stage parallel FIR filter. The proposed 2-stage parallel FIR filter structures can efficiently reduce the number of required multiplications and additions at the expense of delay elements. For a 32-parallel 1152-tap FIR filter, the proposed structure can save 5184 multiplications (67%), 2612 additions (30%), compared to previous parallel FIR structures, at the expense of 10089 delay elements (-133%). The proposed structures will lead to significant hardware savings because the hardware cost of a delay element is only a small portion of that of a multiplier, not including the savings in the number of additions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: