Thank you for the opportunity to answer the questions by a reader of Anesthesia & Analgesia. As previously described in the first report by us (1), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine Type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in women undergoing major gynecologic surgery. Consequently, granisetron was effective for the control of PONV after major gynecologic surgery, with little adverse event. Since then, we have investigated to assess the prophylactic antiemetic therapy with granisetron for preventing PONV after various types of surgery, such as pediatric tonsillectomy, breast surgery, middle ear surgery, and thyroidectomy, with a relatively high incidence of PONV when no prophylactic antiemetic is given. Granisetron lacks the sedative, dyspholic, and extrapyramidal symptoms associated with non-5-HT3 receptor antagonist (e.g., droperidol, metoclopramide) (2,3). Mild headache occurs in patients receiving granisetron for preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis (4). Similarly, in a number of our studies regarding granisetron and PONV, we found that several patients who had received granisetron experienced mild headache and that an incidence of headache was approximately 10%. Consequently, an incidence of headache seems to be identical, but it was true. How much evidence is required to provide adequate proof about antiemetics’ adverse events introduced recently by several investigators? Yoshitaka Fujii, MD
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshitaka Fujii (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: