Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Various ripple effects in uniaxial polycrystalline magnetic films have been related by several authors to an effective single-grain crystalline anisotropy constant K. If either an isotropic planar stress σ or a uniaxial strain ε33 is applied to such a film, the ripple properties are altered. We develop a simple model which includes the effects of such stresses and strains. We thereby evaluate K as an effective crystalline anisotropy given by K=[(K1+Bsε33+¼Bσσ)2+(7/16)(Bσσ)2],1/2where K1 is the fourth order magneto-crystalline anisotropy constant, and B8 and Bσ are appropriate magnetoelastic coupling constants. A convenient ripple parameter is (HP-HK), where HK is the uniaxial anisotropy field of the film and HP is the field in the hard direction at which the in-phase component of the transverse differential susceptibility is a maximum. Measurements of (HP-HK) vs ε33 taken on electroplated cylindrical Ni–Fe films varying in thickness from 3000 Å to a 10,000 Å are presented. While the results are qualitatively in agreement with both Hoffmann's model and Torok's model, there are quantitative discrepancies with both models, particularly Torok's. In as-plated films, (HP-HK) increased more rapidly than expected and was found to be proportional to (ε33)8/3. Several possible mechanisms are proposed to explain this results. It is shown that measurements by several authors on dispersion and susceptibility in as-prepared and annealed films can be explained qualitatively using the proposed formulation for K.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doyle et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: