Spectroscopic analysis reveals an orbital period of 2.47 hours for the detached binary GD 448, indicating formation directly within the cataclysmic variable period gap.
We find that the white dwarf GD 448 is a detached white dwarf/M dwarf binary with an orbital period of 2.47 h. This is the shortest period known for such a binary, placing it in the centre of the ‘period gap’ from 2 to 3 h in which few cataclysmic variable stars (mass-transferring white dwarf/main-sequence star systems) are found. The cooling age of the white dwarf (5 × 107 yr) shows that GD 448 was born in the gap and has never been a cataclysmic variable star. We measure radial velocity semiamplitudes of Kw= 31.2 ± 1.5 km s−1 and KE = 122.2 ± 1.1 km s−1 from Hα absorption from the white dwarf and Hα and Ca ii triplet emission from the M star. The white dwarf absorption shows a gravitational redshift of 16.8 ± 1.6 km s−1, leading to a mass of 0.44 ± 0.03 M⊙ for the white dwarf. The Hα and Ca n emissionline fluxes are modulated by a factor of 4, and are strongest when the M dwarf is furthest from us. The flux variation is consistent with emission proportional to the irradiating flux from the white dwarf, and yet the latter is not hot enough to have produced the emission by photoionization alone. The asymmetric distribution means that KE is less than the true K velocity of the M star, KM. From models of the emission we find that 138 < KM < 168 km s−1 and 0.08 < MM < 0.10 M⊙. Our models independently predict light curves close to those observed. If the M dwarf is close to its main-sequence radius, GD 448 will begin to transfer mass when its orbital period is ≈ 1 h. A great surprise is that the width of the Hα emission from the M dwarf can only be matched with the addition of 90 km s−1 FWHM broadening. The excess broadening does not affect the Ca ii emission, and this suggests that it may arise from thermal or pressure broadening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marsh et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: