Why the study?
Telehealth consultation is an attractive option, prompting evaluation of the feasibility and efficiency of an FDA-approved home-based 12-lead ECG device before appointments with an electrophysiologist.
Is a home-based 12-lead ECG device feasible and efficient for remote use before telehealth appointments?
Is a home-based 12-lead ECG device feasible and efficient for remote use before telehealth appointments?
A home-based 12-lead ECG device demonstrates feasibility for remote clinical care prior to electrophysiology telehealth visits, though technical and functional barriers remain.
Telehealth consultation with a physician can be an attractive option for eligible patients. In this pilot study, we evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of an FDA approved 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device, Smeartheart, that can be used remotely in the patients' home before telehealth appointments with a cardiac electrophysiologist. We scheduled a phone call with 10 patients who used this device as part of their care. Eight patients were able to obtain a diagnostic quality ECG. Telephone call appointments with ECG technicians took a median of 51 minutes, and it took patients an average of 2.2 attempts to record a usable ECG. We also identified barriers to the use of the Smartheart device, including internet accessibility, training material, patient functional status, and motion artifact that may inform more widespread study and utilization of remote-recorded 12-lead ECGs. We conclude that the Smartheart device may have clinical use with remote use in routine clinical care, although the best use of this technology requires further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Disrud et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: