Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dural substitutes must provide immediate restitution of a membranous covering for the brain without inducing any adverse reaction in the host or provoking adhesions to underlying nervous tissues. Ideally, the material should disappear completely and be replaced by tissues similar to the dura mater. In this study, parietal dural defects were created in 12 beagle dogs and closed with a vicryl mesh prosthesis made watertight by a film of bovine collagen. Clinical and biological tolerances were satisfactory. There was one case of early local infection. Gross and microscopic examinations performed between 7 days and 9 months after implantation showed degradation of the prosthetic mesh and connective tissue growth into the implant mimicking dura mater as early as 15 days after implantation. There was no attendant inflammatory reaction or cortical adhesions or other adverse reactions. The authors conclude that collagen-embedded vicryl mesh provides satisfactory biological function and compatibility when used as a substitute for dura mater in the dog.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
San‐Galli et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: