Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Investigations on the role of the time-mean serum uric acid (SUA) value in determining the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited. We investigated whether the time-mean SUA value indicates the risk of CKD, and explored associations of the baseline and time-mean SUA levels with kidney function decline and incident CKD in a healthy population. METHODS: . The SUA level and eGFR were assessed every year in the follow-up period. A multivariate adjusted binary logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of newly-developed CKD among different stratified groups. RESULTS: During the 6-year follow-up period, 227 (4.4%) participants developed CKD. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the odds ratio (OR) for new-onset CKD increased, with higher time-mean SUA levels than at baseline (OR: 1.00 [reference], 2.709 [95% confidence interval: 1.836-5.293], 3.754 [1.898-7.428], and 7.462 [3.694-15.073]). After adjustment for potential cofounders, a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that a higher SUA increased the risk of developing CKD (the adjusted hazard ratios of the highest and lowest quartiles for the baseline and time-mean SUA levels were 1.689 [1.058-2.696] and 6.320 [3.285-12.159], respectively). CONCLUSION: An increased time-mean and single SUA value were independently associated with an increased likelihood of eGFR decline and development of new-onset CKD in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: