Why the study?
Does a zotarolimus-eluting stent reduce target vessel failure compared to a bare metal stent in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions?
Does a zotarolimus-eluting stent reduce target vessel failure compared to a bare metal stent in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions?
Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrate sustained efficacy and safety compared to bare metal stents at 5 years of follow-up in patients with de novo coronary lesions.
Supports ZES over BMS for de novo lesions; extends short-term data to confirmed 5-year durability.
AIMS: We report here the final 5-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR II trial, which was the first randomised trial evaluating the Endeavor(tm) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive ZES or BMS and were followed by telephone or clinic visit up to five years. We evaluated TVF and its components (target vessel revascularisation [TVR], Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, or cardiac death attributed to the target vessel) at five years. Additionally, we report rates of MACE, TLR, and stent thrombosis (protocol- and ARC-defined) through five years. ENDEAVOR II enrolled 1,197 patients (598 ZES, 599 BMS). At five years of follow-up, the rates of TVF (15.4% vs 24.4%), TVR (10.7% vs 20.1%), MACE (15.4% vs 24.6%), and TLR (7.5% vs 16.3%) remained significantly lower in ZES patients compared with BMS patients. ARC definite and probable very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis remained low (0.2% ZES and 0.3% BMS) through five years. CONCLUSIONS: After five years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes with sustained safety compared with BMS in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fajadet et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: