In the current study, we hypothesized that circadian preferences, sleep quality, academic motivation and the academic success of college students (n 5 34) would be associated. Data was gathered from each subject by using a Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), five consecutive nights of the Sleep Cycle App (SCA), Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-C) and by examining the final grade achieved in a General Biology II course and cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA). The results of the MEQ indicated that the overwhelming majority of subjects reporting no preference (68%) while 27% reported a “Morning” preference and only 5% reported a “Evening” preference. Analysis found no significant difference between subjects based on their M-E Preference or AMS-C results for GPA or General Biology grade. Sleep duration and PSQI score were correlated (r 5 -0.45; p 5 0.02) indicating that those that slept more hours/night tended to rate their sleep quality highly as were sleep duration, quality and efficiency. Students that slept between 2-6 hours/night had a significantly lower grade in a general biology course compared with students that slept >6 hours/night (75.57% vs 85.79%; p 5 0.01) and a similar pattern was observed when examining hours of sleep and cumulative GPA (3.17 vs 3.50 GPA; p 5 0.19). Taken as a whole these results indicate while our subjects did not have a strong M-E preference and that this preference did not seem to relate to academic performance, more and/or improved sleep was associated with better academic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mootz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: