Why the study?
Stroke risk scoring systems for AF patients can vary considerably based on status while receiving ablation, motivating a scoring system for risk stratification based on catheter ablation status.
Does the novel AF-CA-Stroke score improve stroke risk prediction compared to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the novel AF-CA-Stroke score improve stroke risk prediction compared to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients with atrial fibrillation?
A novel stroke risk scoring system incorporating AF ablation status (AF-CA-Stroke score) provides superior discrimination for long-term stroke risk compared to traditional CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
May refine AF stroke risk stratification with ablation status; leaves open replacement of CHA2DS2-VASc pending prospective validation.
The stroke risk scoring system for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients can vary considerably based on patients’ status while receiving ablation. This study aimed to demonstrate a novel scoring system for stroke risk stratification based on the status of catheter ablation. First, 787 patients with AF undergoing ablation were matched according to age, sex, and underlying diseases with the same number of patients not undergoing ablation using the propensity-score (PS)-matched cohort. Multivariate Cox model-derived coefficients were used to construct a simple point-based clinical model using the PS-matched cohort. Thereafter, the novel model (AF-CA-Stroke score) was validated in a nationwide AF cohort. The AF-CA-Stroke score was calculated based on age (point = 5), ablation status (point = 4), prior history of stroke (point = 4), chronic kidney disease (point = 2), diabetes mellitus (point = 1), and congestive heart failure (point = 1). Risk function to predict the 1-, 5-, 10-year absolute stroke risks was reported. The estimated area under the receive operating characteristic curve of the AF-CA-Stroke score in the PS-matched cohort was 0.845 (95% confidence interval: 0.824–0.865) to predict long-term stroke. A validation study showed that discrimination abilities in the AF-CA-Stroke scores were significantly higher than those in the CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores. The best cut-off value of the AF-CA-Stroke score to predict future strokes was ≥ 5. This novel model-based point scoring system effectively identifies stroke risk using clinical factors and AF ablation status of patients with AF. Various age stratifications and AF ablation should be considered in AF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: