Why the study?
Does BK channel deletion or TEA treatment prevent hypotension and improve survival in mice with polymicrobial sepsis?
Does BK channel deletion or TEA treatment prevent hypotension and improve survival in mice with polymicrobial sepsis?
BK channel deletion does not prevent sepsis-induced hypotension but worsens survival, suggesting the pressor effects of TEA in sepsis are likely mediated by other potassium channels.
BK channel deletion does not prevent hypotension and worsens survival in septic mice; leaves open whether other K+ channels mediate TEA effects.
Nitric oxide-mediated activation of large conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels is considered an important underlying mechanism of sepsis-induced hypotension. Indeed, the nonselective K-channel inhibitor, tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA), has been proposed as a potential treatment to raise blood pressure in septic shock by virtue of its ability to inhibit BK channels. As experimental evidence has so far relied on pharmacological inhibition, we examined the effects of channel deletion using BKα subunit knockout (α, Slo) mice in two mouse models of polymicrobial sepsis, namely, intraperitoneal fecal slurry and cecal ligation and puncture. Comparison was made against TEA treatment in wild-type (WT) mice. Following slurry, BKα and WT mice developed similar degrees of hypotension over 10 h with no difference in cardiac output as assessed by echocardiography between groups. Tetraethylammonium chloride raised blood pressure significantly in septic WT mice, but had no effect on survival. However, following cecal ligation and puncture, a significantly reduced survival was seen in both BKα mice and (high-dose) TEA-treated WT mice compared with untreated WT animals. In conclusion, the BK channel does not appear to be integral to sepsis-induced hypotension but does affect survival through other mechanisms. The pressor effect of TEA may be related to effects on other potassium channels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Brien et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: