This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
From the standpoint of designing microporous frameworks with desired pore diameter and dimensionality, and, especially, the optimization of crystal habit, the crystal engineering of new zeolites must be based on concepts/procedures different from those appropriate for the design of organic crystals. This is because the structure building units proposed by Barrer and co-workers are probably not instrumental for framework construction, thus eliminating the important ‘synthon’ approach used for the construction of innovative organic solids. With some variant of the Flanigen model for crystal growth via one SiO 2 unit at a time, the best approach to zeolite crytal growth engineering appears to occur indirectly via structure directing agents that can also be modified to influence the emergent crystal habit. Prospects for identifying frameworks emerging from synthesis gels are also discussed in this review, revealing that the use of radial distribution functions is less informative than for the analysis of silicate glasses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas L. Dorset (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: