Why the study?
Hip spica casting under general anesthesia is standard for pediatric femoral shaft fractures, but prefabricated functional braces can be applied in the emergency department without general anesthesia.
Does prefabricated functional bracing reduce hospital utilization and charges compared to hip spica casting in children aged 6 months to 5 years with isolated unilateral femoral shaft fractures?
Does prefabricated functional bracing reduce hospital utilization and charges compared to hip spica casting in children aged 6 months to 5 years with isolated unilateral femoral shaft fractures?
Prefabricated functional bracing for pediatric femoral shaft fractures avoids general anesthesia, shortens length of stay, and reduces hospital charges compared to traditional spica casting.
PFB may reduce anesthesia exposure, LOS, and costs in selected young children with femur fractures; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Hip spica casting under general anesthesia is standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures in children aged 6 months to 5 years. Prefabricated functional braces (PFBs) can be applied in the emergency department without general anesthesia. We compared hospital utilization, charges, reimbursement, and short-term outcomes between treatments. METHODS: We reviewed children aged 6 months to 5 years with isolated unilateral femoral shaft fractures treated at a single level I trauma center. Spica patients were identified retrospectively (2021 to 2024; n=38), and PFB patients were identified (2024 to 2025; n=22). We compared length of stay (LOS), hospital-based (HB) and professional-based (PB) charges, reimbursement proportion, sedation requirements, and complications. Insurance was categorized as public versus private, and reimbursement was analyzed overall and within insurance strata. RESULTS: PFB treatment reduced LOS (16.4±8.2 vs. 26.2±15.9 h, P=0.003) and total charges ($56,372±$15,212 vs. $78,892±$14,780, P<0.001), a mean reduction of $22,520 per patient (~$20,000 net after device cost). Public insurance was more common in the spica group (71% vs. 41%, P=0.030). Overall reimbursement proportion was higher for PFB (47.8%±37.4% vs. 26.2%±30.2%, P=0.027); however, within insurance strata, reimbursement did not differ significantly by treatment, suggesting the unadjusted difference was attributable to payer mix. No brace patient required general anesthesia; 77% required no sedation. Total charges did not differ by sedation status within the brace group ($55,594 vs. $55,640). Complication rates were similar (27% vs. 37%, P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected young children with femoral shaft fractures, PFB management avoids general anesthesia, shortens LOS, and substantially reduces charges while maintaining comparable short-term clinical outcomes. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stamatos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: