Why the study?
Does maternal diabetes affect the type of palsy and spontaneous recovery in newborn babies with obstetric brachial plexus palsy compared to non-diabetic mothers?
Does maternal diabetes affect the type of palsy and spontaneous recovery in newborn babies with obstetric brachial plexus palsy compared to non-diabetic mothers?
Contrary to the general hypothesis, spontaneous recovery of obstetric brachial plexus palsy in babies of diabetic mothers is not worse, and may be better in specific total palsy cases, compared to non-diabetic mothers.
Maternal diabetes does not worsen spontaneous recovery in obstetric brachial plexus palsy; challenges prior assumptions and leaves open potential benefits in total palsy.
Compared to non-diabetic mothers, diabetic mothers are known to deliver larger babies who are at higher risk for shoulder dystocia and obstetric brachial plexus palsy. The intrapartum forces applied during delivery of larger babies are expected to be higher. Hence, the chances of these babies for good spontaneous recovery are expected to be lower; and this is a generally believed hypothesis. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare obstetric brachial plexus palsy in newborn babies of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. There were a total of 655 cases of obstetric palsy: 253 cases with diabetic mothers and 402 with non-diabetic mothers. The former were more likely to develop total palsy while the latter were more likely to develop extended Erb's palsy. Newborn babies of diabetic mothers had significantly larger birth weights than those of non-diabetic mothers regardless of the type of palsy. The rate of good spontaneous recovery of the motor power of the limb in the two groups was not significantly different except in total palsy cases for shoulder external rotation and elbow flexion where the recovery was significantly better in the diabetic group. It was concluded that the generally believed hypothesis is not correct if one compares the outcome in the diabetic and non-diabetic groups for each type of palsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Qattan et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: