Why the study?
Patients with unilateral obstructive CAD on CCTA typically undergo bilateral visualization during ICA, but whether a selective visualization strategy is accurate and reduces procedure time and contrast use remained unproven.
Does a CCTA-guided selective ICA strategy reduce procedure time and contrast agent use in patients with unilateral obstructive CAD?
Does a CCTA-guided selective ICA strategy reduce procedure time and contrast agent use in patients with unilateral obstructive CAD?
A CCTA-guided selective invasive coronary angiography strategy is highly accurate in ruling out contralateral CAD and significantly reduces both contrast volume and procedure time compared to routine bilateral visualization.
May support selective ICA in unilateral CCTA CAD; leaves open prospective outcome trials before practice change.
Background: Symptomatic patients with unilateral obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) identified by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), involving either the right or left coronary artery, typically undergo per-protocol bilateral coronary visualization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, a selective visualization approach may be sufficient. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the accuracy of CCTA in excluding hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with unilateral CAD and to evaluate whether a CCTA-guided selective ICA strategy can reduce procedure time and contrast agent use. Methods: In this cross-sectional cohort study, 454 patients with clinically suspected stable CAD who underwent CCTA prior to ICA were included. The study population consisted of 190 patients with unilateral obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis on CCTA, and an absence of obstructive CAD on the contralateral side. ICA with invasive functional assessment was used as the reference standard. Results: CCTA demonstrated a high accuracy, 97.4% (95% CI: 94–99%), in excluding hemodynamically significant disease in the contralateral arteries without obstructive CAD. Compared to the conventional ICA approach, a CCTA-guided selective visualization strategy resulted in significant reductions in procedure time and contrast agent usage: procedure time and contrast agent usage were reduced by 27% (95% CI: 12.1–47.5%) and 46.8% (95% CI: 27.5–67.0%), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with unilateral obstructive CAD identified by CCTA, a CCTA-guided selective ICA visualization strategy is highly accurate in ruling out hemodynamically significant CAD on the contralateral side. Additionally, this unilateral ICA approach has the potential to reduce both contrast agent usage and procedure time compared to the conventional bilateral visualization strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahdal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: