Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) is ascribed to phrenic nerve palsy. This study investigated the effect of 2 volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine on efficacy of block as a surgical anesthetic and as an analgesic and examined diaphragm compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and pulmonary function before and after SCBPB. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for removal of hardware for internal fixation after healing of an upper limb fracture distal to the shoulder were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided SCBPC for surgical anesthesia with 20 mL (Group A) or 30 mL (Group B) 0.375% ropivacaine. The latency and amplitude of diaphragm CMAPs and forced vital capacity (FVC), FVC% predicted, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured before and 30 min after SCBPB. RESULTS: Block success as primary anesthetic in addition to analgesia was 81% in Group A and 91% in Group B. There were no obvious differences in the effectiveness of analgesia between the two groups. The mean time to onset of motor block was significantly longer in Group A (8.1±2.7 min) than in Group B (5.4 ± 2.8 min; p<0.05). The mean amplitude of the diaphragm CMAP was significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (p=0.03). The changes in FVC (Group A, - 8.1% vs Group B, -16.5%), FVC% (Group A, -8.0% vs Group B, -17.1%), and FEV1 (Group A, -9.5% vs Group B, -15.2%) from pre-SCBPB to post-SCBPB were significantly less in Group A than in Group B (all p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rates of phrenic nerve palsy and diaphragm paralysis were reduced, and lung function was less impaired in patients who received 20 mL vs 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine without any differences in block success. Selecting a lower volume of anesthetic for nerve block may be especially beneficial in obese patients or patients with cardiopulmonary disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IND-17012166.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: